Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer
Wavecrest Knowledge Base

Tag: reporting

Understanding the QUIC Protocol: Security and Reporting Implications for Cyfin Users

Category: SSL Inspection

Overview

QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connections) is a transport layer protocol developed by Google to improve web performance and reduce latency. While QUIC offers speed benefits, it creates significant challenges for network security and reporting solutions like Cyfin. This article explains how QUIC works, its impact on your network visibility, and how to resolve issues associated with QUIC traffic.

What is QUIC?

QUIC is essentially HTTP/2 over UDP rather than the traditional TCP protocol. Where protocols like SPDY and HTTP/2 were incremental improvements to HTTP over TCP, QUIC takes a fundamentally different approach by using UDP as its transport mechanism.

Current QUIC Adoption

  • Enabled by default in Google Chrome (which holds approximately 60% of browser market share)
  • Supported in Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Opera, and other modern browsers
  • Implemented across all Google properties (YouTube, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Search, etc.)
  • Growing adoption by third-party websites and services
  • Increasingly used by malicious actors who recognize QUIC as a way to bypass security controls

The Security Problem

The core issue is not with QUIC itself, but rather that most firewalls and security appliances do not recognize QUIC traffic as web traffic. This creates a significant security gap.

Why Firewalls Can’t Process QUIC

Traditional firewalls have extensive functionality for HTTP and HTTPS traffic:

  • Deep packet inspection
  • Web filtering and categorization
  • Malware scanning
  • Content filtering
  • Enhanced logging and reporting

These features work because firewalls can interpret HTTP/HTTPS traffic from Layer 4 up to Layer 7. However, QUIC uses UDP on ports 80 and 443 (the same ports as HTTP/HTTPS), but that’s where the similarity ends. Network devices cannot determine the application protocol and treat QUIC as generic Layer 4 UDP traffic.

Real-World Security Implications

When QUIC traffic bypasses inspection, organizations face:

  • Loss of content filtering: Cannot restrict access to YouTube or enforce Google SafeSearch
  • Malware exposure: Malware and ransomware can be downloaded through Gmail or QUIC-enabled websites without detection
  • Policy violations: Web usage policies cannot be enforced on QUIC traffic
  • Compliance risks: Unable to meet regulatory requirements for web traffic monitoring

Impact on Cyfin Reporting

Incomplete Visibility

Cyfin relies on comprehensive logging from your firewall or UTM to provide accurate web usage reports. When QUIC is enabled:

  • Missing web traffic data: Most firewalls only log QUIC as generic UDP traffic in firewall logs, not web logs
  • Lost URL information: Cannot capture full URLs for Google Search terms or YouTube videos
  • Incomplete user activity: Web filtering logs are not generated for QUIC sessions
  • Inaccurate bandwidth reports: QUIC traffic may be miscategorized or missing from web usage reports

Example: Normal Traffic vs. QUIC

Normal HTTPS Traffic (Logged Properly):

  • Complete URL captured
  • Website category identified
  • User information recorded
  • Full web filtering logs generated

QUIC Traffic (Limited Logging):

  • Only IP address and port visible
  • No URL information
  • No category data
  • Only basic firewall log entry (UDP traffic)

If you’ve noticed a recent decline in reported traffic to Google sites (YouTube, Gmail, Drive, etc.) in Cyfin, there is a high probability your firewall is allowing QUIC.

The Solution: Block QUIC Protocol

The good news is that when QUIC communication is blocked, browsers and servers automatically fall back to traditional HTTP/HTTPS over TCP, where traffic can be inspected, controlled, logged, and reported on normally.

General Approach

Most firewall vendors recommend blocking QUIC until full protocol support is added to their products. Methods vary by firewall:

  • Block by application type (QUIC protocol)
  • Block UDP traffic on ports 80 and 443
  • Use application control features
  • Create custom firewall rules

Important Consideration: Before blocking UDP on port 443, verify that you’re not blocking other legitimate services. Some applications like OpenVPN can use UDP on port 443 for SSL VPN connections.

Firewall-Specific Configuration Guides

Below are links and instructions for blocking QUIC on popular firewall platforms:

Fortinet FortiGate

FortiGate firewalls offer multiple methods to block QUIC:

Method 1: Application Control (Recommended)

  1. Navigate to Security Profiles > Application Control
  2. Create a new profile or edit an existing one
  3. Under “Application and Filter Overrides,” select “Create New”
  4. Search for “QUIC” application signature
  5. Set the action to “Block”
  6. Apply this profile to your firewall policies

Method 2: Custom Firewall Policy

  1. Create custom firewall services for UDP ports 80 and 443
  2. Configure a firewall policy with these custom services
  3. Set the action to “Deny”

Note: From FortiOS v7.2.0 onward, the default QUIC blocking option was removed. You must now use Application and Filter Overrides to block QUIC.

Method 3: SSL Inspection Profile (FortiOS 7.4+)

  • Use SSL inspection profiles to detect and block QUIC traffic
  • Create a custom inspection profile before making changes

Reference: Fortinet Community – Block QUIC Protocol

Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto firewalls can inspect QUIC traffic but cannot decrypt it like traditional HTTPS. Blocking QUIC forces fallback to standard SSL/TLS which can be decrypted with SSL Forward Proxy.

Configuration Steps:

  1. Create a custom service object for UDP ports 80 and 443:
    • Navigate to Objects > Services
    • Click “+Add”
    • Set Protocol to UDP
    • Enter Destination Ports: 80, 443
  2. Create security policies:
    • Navigate to Policies > Security
    • Create two rules:
      • Rule 1: Block the custom UDP service
      • Rule 2: Block the QUIC application
    • Set both rules to “Deny” action
    • Configure appropriate zones, sources, and destinations

Note: With some Chrome versions, QUIC may be misidentified as “unknown-udp.” Create an additional rule to block unknown UDP traffic on ports 80 and 443.

Reference: Palo Alto Knowledge Base – Block QUIC

SonicWall

SonicWall offers multiple approaches depending on your firmware version:

Method 1: Application Control (SonicOS 6.x and later)

  1. Navigate to Security Services > App Control Advanced
  2. Locate “Google QUIC” application
  3. Set the action to “Block”
  4. Apply to relevant firewall policies

Method 2: Security Policy with Application Match (SonicOS 7.0+)

  1. Create a custom service object:
    • Navigate to Objects > Services
    • Create service for UDP port 443
    • Click Save
  2. Create a security policy:
    • Navigate to Policy > Rules and Policies > Security Policy
    • Click “Add” at the top
    • Configure Source/Destination zones, addresses, services
    • Under “App/URL/Custom Match,” set Match Operation to “OR”
    • Add “Google QUIC” to Application Match Group
    • Set Action to “Deny”
    • Enable the policy and save

Method 3: Custom Firewall Service

  1. Create service objects for UDP ports 80 and 443
  2. Create a firewall rule denying these UDP ports
  3. Position the rule appropriately in your rule base

References:

Sophos XG/Sophos Firewall

Sophos firewalls provide native QUIC blocking functionality:

Method 1: Firewall Rule with QUIC Blocking (Recommended)

  1. Navigate to Rules and Policies > Firewall Rules
  2. Create a new firewall rule or edit existing LAN to WAN rule
  3. In the rule settings, enable the following:
    • “Scan HTTP and decrypted HTTPS”
    • “Block QUIC protocol” (This is the key setting)
    • “Decrypt HTTPS” (if using web proxy)
  4. Under Services, ensure UDP ports 443 and 80 are included (or set Services to “Any”)
  5. Position the rule appropriately
  6. Click Save

Important: The “Block QUIC protocol” option only works when UDP 443/80 is included in the Services section of the firewall rule. If QUIC service is not included, the blocking will not function properly.

Method 2: Application Control

  1. Navigate to Web > Application Filter
  2. Create a new application filter or edit existing
  3. Add “QUIC” protocol to the filter
  4. Set action to “Block”
  5. Apply the filter to your firewall policy

Method 3: Create Custom QUIC Service (if needed)

  1. Navigate to System > Hosts and Services > Services
  2. Click “Add” to create a new service
  3. Create services for:
    • UDP port 443
    • UDP port 80
  4. Apply these services in firewall rules with Deny action

References:

Cisco Firepower / ASA

Configuration Steps:

  1. Create a custom application filter or use access control policy
  2. Block application “QUIC” or create service policy blocking UDP 443/80
  3. Apply to appropriate access control rules

For Cisco Umbrella/AnyConnect SWG users, QUIC must be blocked to ensure proper proxy operation:

  • Block UDP port 443 at the firewall
  • Or block QUIC by application name if Layer 7 inspection is available

Reference: Cisco – Disable QUIC for AnyConnect SWG

WatchGuard

Configuration Steps:

  1. Navigate to Firewall > Packet Filter
  2. Create a new packet filter policy
  3. Set Protocol to UDP
  4. Set Destination Port to 443 and 80
  5. Set Action to Deny
  6. Apply to WAN-bound traffic

pfSense / OPNsense

Configuration Steps:

  1. Navigate to Firewall > Rules
  2. Create new rule on LAN interface
  3. Set Action to “Block”
  4. Set Protocol to “UDP”
  5. Set Destination Port to 443 and 80
  6. Add description: “Block QUIC Protocol”
  7. Save and apply changes

Generic Firewall Configuration

If your specific firewall is not listed above, follow these general steps:

  1. Identify QUIC Traffic: UDP on ports 80 and 443
  2. Create a blocking rule:
    • Protocol: UDP
    • Destination Ports: 80, 443
    • Action: Deny/Drop/Block
  3. Position the rule before any “allow all” or broader rules
  4. Test thoroughly to ensure legitimate UDP services aren’t affected

Browser-Level Blocking (Alternative)

If firewall-level blocking isn’t possible, you can disable QUIC in browsers:

Google Chrome

  1. Enter chrome://flags in the address bar
  2. Search for “Experimental QUIC protocol”
  3. Set to “Disabled”
  4. Restart browser

Enterprise Deployment via Group Policy:

  1. Open Group Policy Management Console
  2. Navigate to User Configuration > Policies > Administrative Templates > Google > Google Chrome
  3. Find “Allow QUIC protocol” setting
  4. Set to “Disabled”

Microsoft Edge

  1. Enter edge://flags in the address bar
  2. Search for “Experimental QUIC protocol”
  3. Set to “Disabled”
  4. Restart browser

Mozilla Firefox

  1. Enter about:config in the address bar
  2. Search for network.http.http3.enabled
  3. Set to false

Note: Browser-level blocking requires configuration on every device and can be circumvented by users. Firewall-level blocking is the recommended enterprise solution.

Testing QUIC Status

Verify if QUIC is Active

Method 1: Chrome Developer Tools

  1. Open Google Chrome
  2. Press F12 or Ctrl+Shift+I to open Developer Tools
  3. Go to the Network tab
  4. Right-click column headers and enable “Protocol” column
  5. Visit a Google website (google.com, youtube.com, etc.)
  6. Look for protocols showing “http/2+quic/43” or “h3” (HTTP/3)

If you see QUIC protocols, your browser is using QUIC and it’s likely not being blocked.

Method 2: Chrome QUIC Sessions

  1. Open Chrome
  2. Enter chrome://net-internals/#quic in the address bar
  3. View active QUIC sessions

Method 3: Browser Extension

  • Install the “HTTP/2 and SPDY indicator” Chrome extension
  • It will show which pages are served via QUIC/HTTP3

Verify QUIC is Blocked

After implementing firewall rules:

  1. Use the testing methods above
  2. You should see protocols fall back to “h2” (HTTP/2 over TCP) or “https”
  3. Check firewall logs for denied UDP 443/80 traffic
  4. Confirm Cyfin is now capturing full URL information for Google services

Impact on User Experience

Performance Considerations

Google and other proponents claim QUIC reduces latency and improves page load times. However:

  • The general consensus is there is no noticeable difference for average users when QUIC is disabled
  • Websites will continue to function normally via standard HTTPS
  • Security and visibility benefits far outweigh minimal performance differences

User Communication

When deploying QUIC blocking:

  • Most users will not notice any change
  • Web pages continue to load normally
  • All services (YouTube, Gmail, etc.) remain fully functional
  • No user action required

Benefits of Blocking QUIC

Once QUIC is blocked and traffic falls back to standard HTTPS:

Security Benefits

✓ Full deep packet inspection restored
✓ Malware scanning active on all web traffic
✓ Content filtering policies enforced
✓ Web usage policies properly applied
✓ Compliance requirements met

Cyfin Reporting Benefits

✓ Complete URL logging restored
✓ Accurate web category reporting
✓ Full user activity visibility
✓ Search term monitoring enabled
✓ YouTube video tracking operational
✓ Bandwidth reporting accuracy improved
✓ User productivity reports complete

Best Practices

  1. Block at the firewall, not just the browser
    • Firewall-level blocking is centralized and cannot be bypassed
    • Browser settings can be changed by users
  2. Test before full deployment
    • Implement in a test environment first
    • Verify no impact to legitimate UDP services
    • Confirm Cyfin reporting shows expected improvement
  3. Document the change
    • Record which rules block QUIC
    • Note the date of implementation
    • Document any exceptions needed
  4. Monitor after implementation
    • Watch for any blocked legitimate traffic
    • Verify Cyfin reports show improved visibility
    • Check for any user complaints
  5. Keep informed about QUIC support
    • Monitor your firewall vendor for QUIC inspection support
    • When proper QUIC support is available, you may be able to unblock and inspect instead
    • Subscribe to vendor security advisories

Troubleshooting

QUIC Still Active After Blocking

Issue: Testing shows QUIC is still being used

Solutions:

  • Verify firewall rule is positioned correctly (higher priority than allow rules)
  • Confirm rule includes both UDP ports 80 AND 443
  • Check that rule applies to correct source/destination zones
  • Ensure browser cache is cleared (Ctrl+F5)
  • Restart browser completely
  • Test from a different device

Cyfin Still Missing Google Traffic

Issue: Reports still don’t show full Google traffic details

Solutions:

  • Allow 24-48 hours for logs to accumulate after blocking QUIC
  • Verify firewall is logging web traffic properly
  • Confirm Cyfin is receiving syslog/logs from firewall
  • Check that HTTPS decryption/inspection is enabled on firewall
  • Verify Content Filtering Service (CFS) is active on firewall

Legitimate Services Broken

Issue: Some applications stopped working after blocking UDP 443

Solutions:

  • Identify which applications are affected
  • Check if they use UDP 443 for legitimate purposes (VPNs, etc.)
  • Create exception rules for specific source/destination IPs
  • Consider blocking QUIC by application signature instead of port-based blocking

Summary

QUIC is a modern protocol designed to make the web faster, but it creates significant security and reporting challenges. For organizations using Cyfin to monitor and report on web activity, QUIC represents a blind spot that can hide inappropriate usage, malware, and policy violations.

Key Takeaways:

  • QUIC bypasses traditional firewall inspection and web filtering
  • Cyfin cannot report on QUIC traffic accurately
  • Blocking QUIC forces automatic fallback to inspectable HTTPS
  • Users experience no functional impact when QUIC is blocked
  • Security and visibility benefits far outweigh minor performance differences

Recommendation: Block QUIC protocol at your firewall until vendors provide full inspection capabilities. This ensures comprehensive security protection and complete visibility in your Cyfin reports.

Additional Resources

Cyfin Support

  • Contact Cyfin support for assistance with reporting issues
  • Verify your Cyfin configuration is optimized for your firewall

Firewall Vendor Resources

  • Consult your firewall vendor’s documentation for latest QUIC blocking guidance
  • Check for firmware updates that may include QUIC inspection features
  • Subscribe to security bulletins for updates on QUIC support

Further Reading

Document Version: 1.0
Last Updated: November 2025
Applies To: Cyfin Web Reporting and all supported firewall platforms

Enabling SSL Inspection for Optimal Cyfin Performance: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Category: SSL Inspection

Introduction

SSL inspection (also known as TLS decryption or HTTPS interception) is a critical feature for Cyfin users, allowing deep analysis of encrypted employee web traffic to identify security threats, enforce policies, and generate comprehensive reports. Without proper SSL inspection, a significant portion of web activity remains hidden, creating blind spots that expose organizations to malware, data exfiltration, and compliance risks. However, enabling SSL inspection isn’t always straightforward. Issues like outdated certificates or enabled QUIC can disrupt functionality, leading to incomplete monitoring and undetected threats.

This knowledge base article outlines common pitfalls when setting up or maintaining SSL inspection, based on industry best practices and known challenges. It provides guidance to help Cyfin customers configure their environments effectively, whether they’re new to SSL inspection or troubleshooting existing setups. By addressing these issues, you can ensure Cyfin delivers full visibility into web traffic while minimizing disruptions.

Why SSL Inspection Matters for Cyfin

Cyfin relies on decrypting SSL/TLS traffic to perform in-depth analysis, such as detecting malicious content, tracking user behavior, and generating accurate reports. Encrypted traffic now accounts for over 90% of web activity, making inspection essential for security. Without it, threats hidden in HTTPS streams— like command-and-control communications or phishing—go unnoticed, increasing the risk of breaches. Proper setup ensures Cyfin can inspect this traffic without compromising network performance or user experience.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Below are key issues that can hinder SSL inspection, along with symptoms, resolutions, and the security risks if left unaddressed. These are drawn from common network security challenges and apply to setups involving firewalls, proxies, or integrated tools like CyBlock (Wavecrest’s companion product for filtering).

1. Outdated or Incorrect Certificates

Description: SSL inspection requires generating and using intermediate certificates signed by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA). Using expired, revoked, or mismatched certificates (e.g., those with SHA1 algorithms or improper chaining) can cause failures.

Symptoms: Connection errors, browser warnings (e.g., “NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID”), or incomplete decryption, leading to bypassed inspection.

How to Avoid:

  • Always use the latest certificates from a reputable CA. Rotate them regularly (e.g., automate short-lived cert issuance).
  • Ensure proper PKI implementation: Verify certificate chaining, use correct Subject Alternative Names (SAN), and avoid deprecated algorithms like SHA1.
  • For Cyfin integrations, check Wavecrest documentation for certificate generation tools in CyBlock or compatible proxies.

Security Risks if Ignored: Partial or failed decryption leaves encrypted threats undetected, allowing malware or data leaks to bypass Cyfin’s analysis.

2. QUIC Protocol Enabled

Description: QUIC (used in HTTP/3) is a UDP-based protocol with proprietary encryption that most inspection tools, including firewalls, cannot decrypt. It bypasses traditional SSL inspection over TCP.

Symptoms: Traffic to sites like Google or Facebook evades inspection, showing errors like “ERR_QUIC_PROTOCOL_ERROR” or incomplete Cyfin reports.

How to Avoid:

  • Block QUIC by denying UDP ports 80 and 443 in your firewall rules, forcing fallback to TCP/TLS.
  • Disable QUIC in browsers (e.g., via Chrome flags: chrome://flags/#enable-quic).
  • In Cyfin setups, ensure your proxy or firewall (e.g., integrated with CyBlock) has QUIC blocking enabled.

Security Risks if Ignored: QUIC traffic remains uninspected, hiding potential threats and reducing Cyfin’s effectiveness in monitoring employee activity.

3. Lack of CA Certificate Trust on Client Devices

Description: Client devices must trust the inspection device’s root CA certificate for seamless decryption. Without this, browsers and apps reject the intercepted certificates.

Symptoms: Persistent certificate warnings, blocked sites, or apps failing to connect (e.g., in managed environments).

How to Avoid:

  • Deploy the CA certificate to all devices via Group Policy (Windows), MDM tools (mobile), or browser trust stores.
  • Test on a small group first to ensure compatibility.
  • For Cyfin, use Wavecrest’s guides to import certs into CyBlock or your proxy setup.

Security Risks if Ignored: Users may disable inspection to avoid warnings, creating unmonitored traffic and exposing the network to risks Cyfin is designed to detect.

4. Performance Degradation

Description: Decrypting and re-encrypting traffic adds computational load, leading to latency, reduced throughput, and overburdened devices.

Symptoms: Slow network speeds, high CPU usage on firewalls/proxies, or dropped connections during peak times.

How to Avoid:

  • Use dedicated hardware or proxy-based solutions like CyBlock, which offload inspection from firewalls.
  • Limit inspection to high-risk traffic (e.g., exempt banking sites).
  • Distribute load across multiple devices and monitor performance metrics.

Security Risks if Ignored: Overloaded systems may fail to inspect all traffic, allowing threats to slip through undetected by Cyfin.

5. Incompatible Applications or Websites

Description: Some apps/sites use certificate pinning, non-standard protocols, unsupported ciphers, or client certificate authentication, causing inspection to fail.

Symptoms: Specific sites (e.g., with HSTS or pinning) show errors, or apps like banking software refuse connections.

How to Avoid:

  • Create bypass rules for known incompatible sites/apps.
  • Update inspection devices to support modern ciphers and TLS versions (e.g., TLS 1.3).
  • Test thoroughly in a staging environment before rollout.

Security Risks if Ignored: Bypassed traffic remains unmonitored, potentially harboring malware or policy violations invisible to Cyfin.

6. Emerging Technologies and Protocol Changes

Description: New features like DNS over HTTPS (DoH) or Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) obscure traffic metadata, reducing inspection effectiveness.

Symptoms: Incomplete visibility into traffic origins or content, leading to gaps in Cyfin reports.

How to Avoid:

  • Block or redirect DoH requests to internal resolvers.
  • Stay updated with firmware/patches for your inspection tools.
  • Integrate advanced proxies like CyBlock for better handling of evolving encryption.

Security Risks if Ignored: Evolving threats exploit these blind spots, evading Cyfin’s detection and increasing breach likelihood.

7. Privacy, Legal, and Configuration Issues

Description: Improper setup can expose sensitive data, violate privacy laws, or weaken security (e.g., using outdated TLS versions).

Symptoms: User complaints about privacy, legal challenges, or increased vulnerability to attacks.

How to Avoid:

  • Exempt sensitive categories (e.g., healthcare) and disclose policies to employees.
  • Consult legal experts for compliance.
  • Use secure configurations: Enforce strong ciphers and full server validation.

Security Risks if Ignored: Beyond legal fines, misconfigurations can introduce new vulnerabilities, undermining Cyfin’s protective role.

Best Practices for Cyfin Users

  • Start Small: Enable inspection for a pilot group to identify issues early.
  • Monitor and Update: Regularly review logs, patch systems, and use tools like CyBlock for enhanced filtering.
  • Integrate with Wavecrest Tools: Combine Cyfin with CyBlock for proxy-based inspection to avoid firewall overload.
  • Educate Users: Explain the benefits to build trust and reduce resistance.
  • Test Thoroughly: Simulate traffic to verify setup before full deployment.

By proactively addressing these pitfalls, Cyfin customers can achieve robust SSL inspection, maximizing security and visibility. If issues persist, contact Wavecrest support for tailored assistance.

v9.7.1 Release Notes for CyBlock Software & Virtual Appliance Release Notes

Category: Release Notes

Enhancements

  • Log Configurations
    • Parser
      • Improved performance when tokenizing keyword value entries by removing reliance on streams.
      • Improved performance by using pre-configured patterns for parsing instead of instantiating per record.
  • Reporting
    • Sessions
      • Improved Session Analyzer speed by threading the individual app look ups. Added unique connect timeout configuration for metric server client.
  • Data Management
    • Import
      • Improved performance by removing full URL checks for hits/visits during import process.
      • Improved import speed by threading bulk inserts into metric server instead of using single broker thread.

v9.7.1 Release Notes for Cyfin

Category: Release Notes

Enhancements

  • Log Configurations
    • Parser
      • Improved performance when tokenizing keyword value entries by removing reliance on streams.
      • Improved performance by using pre-configured patterns for parsing instead of instantiating per record.
  • Reporting
    • Sessions
      • Improved Session Analyzer speed by threading the individual app look ups. Added unique connect timeout configuration for metric server client.
  • Data Management
    • Import
      • Improved performance by removing full URL checks for visit analysis during the import process. This reduces processing time for user session tracking while preserving reporting accuracy. Hit analysis remains unaffected.
      • Improved import speed by threading bulk inserts into metric server instead of using single broker thread.
  • Log Configurations
    • Syslog
      • Added ability to configure SSL cert by port. 

Corrections

  • Data Management
    • Import
      • Corrected issue where absence of doc id was considered a hit.
      • Removed legacy exclude domains check

Best Practices in Monitoring Employee Web Activity: The Role of Cyfin

Category: Best Practices

Introduction

In today’s digital workplace, understanding and monitoring employee web activity is not just a matter of assessing productivity; it’s about ensuring security, compliance, and optimal use of resources. This document explores best practices in monitoring employee web activity, with a focus on the capabilities of Cyfin, a leading tool in this domain.

Defining ‘Activity’ in the Workplace

‘Activity’ in the context of employee web use encompasses a range of digital behaviors – from browsing patterns to the use of online tools and platforms. It’s vital to differentiate between productive activities that contribute to business objectives and non-productive activities that may pose risks or waste resources.

The Importance of Monitoring Employee Web Activity

Monitoring employee web activity is crucial for several reasons:

  • Ensuring Productivity: By understanding how employees use the web, organizations can optimize workflows and eliminate inefficiencies.
  • Protecting Company Resources: Monitoring helps in preventing the misuse of company resources and maintaining operational security.
  • Legal and Compliance Adherence: It ensures that employee web usage complies with relevant laws and industry regulations.

Cyfin’s Key Features

Cyfin stands out for its robust capabilities in monitoring and reporting employee web activity. Key features include:

  • Detailed Investigations: Cyfin excels in investigating web usage, offering insights into both regular and anomalous activities.
  • Activity Categorization: It categorizes web use into productive and non-productive, aiding in the analysis of employee efficiency.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: The tool provides clear and detailed reports, making it easier for management to understand web usage patterns.

Investigation and Analysis

Through Cyfin, organizations can conduct in-depth investigations into web activity, identifying potential security threats or policy violations. This level of analysis is critical in understanding employee behavior and safeguarding against various risks.

Data-Driven Policy Making

The insights provided by Cyfin are invaluable in shaping company policies related to web use. Policies can be tailored based on actual data, leading to more effective management and regulation of employee web activity.

Legal and Security Implications

Understanding employee web activity through Cyfin helps in identifying potential legal and security liabilities, such as data breaches or non-compliance with regulations. This knowledge is vital for proactive risk management.

Balancing Monitoring with Privacy

It’s important to balance the need for monitoring with respecting employee privacy. This includes being transparent about monitoring practices and ensuring compliance with legal standards for employee monitoring.

Best Practices in Implementation

For effective implementation of Cyfin or similar tools, organizations should:

  • Obtain necessary permissions and ensure legal compliance.
  • Train relevant teams on using and interpreting the monitoring data.
  • Regularly review and update the monitoring process.

Continuous Improvement and Adaptation

Finally, it’s important to continually assess and improve the monitoring process. As technologies and workplace dynamics evolve, so should the strategies for monitoring employee web activity.

Conclusion

Effective monitoring of employee web activity is key to maintaining a productive, secure, and compliant workplace. Tools like Cyfin play a crucial role in achieving these objectives, offering detailed insights and aiding in informed decision-making.

Maximizing Workplace Efficiency and Security: The Role of Employee Web-Use Monitoring Tools

Category: Best Practices

In today’s digital-first workplace, understanding and managing employee web usage is not just about ensuring productivity; it’s about safeguarding company assets and fostering a responsible work environment. Implementing a robust tool like Cyfin for web-use monitoring can play a pivotal role in achieving these objectives. Here’s how:

Uncovering Insights into Employee Behavior:

  • Cyfin and similar tools go beyond basic monitoring; they provide deep insights into employee behavior. By analyzing web usage patterns, employers can identify trends and behaviors that might go unnoticed. This includes identifying excessive non-work-related browsing or potential security breaches.
  • Such tools use sophisticated algorithms to differentiate between work-related and personal web usage, offering a more nuanced understanding of how employees engage with the internet during work hours.

Enhancing Investigative Capabilities:

  • In scenarios where there’s a need for an investigation, whether it’s for a security incident or compliance issue, having the right tool is indispensable. Cyfin offers detailed, accurate logs and reports that can be crucial in forensic investigations.
  • The ability to swiftly identify the source of a security breach or inappropriate usage can save a company from significant financial and reputational damage.

Boosting Productivity Through Data-Driven Insights:

  • By accurately measuring and reporting on employee web usage, tools like Cyfin enable organizations to optimize their workforce. They can identify underutilized resources or overburdened employees, allowing for better workload distribution.
  • This data-driven approach helps in making informed decisions about policy changes, training needs, or infrastructural improvements.

Ensuring Compliance and Ethical Monitoring:

  • In an era where compliance with data protection regulations is paramount, Cyfin aids in ensuring that an organization’s monitoring practices are legally compliant.
  • These tools are designed to respect employee privacy while still providing the necessary oversight. This dual focus is critical in maintaining trust within the organization and adhering to legal standards.

Adapting to Evolving Cybersecurity Threats:

  • As cybersecurity threats evolve, having a tool that can adapt and respond to new types of risks is vital. Cyfin and similar tools are regularly updated to handle emerging threats, ensuring that an organization’s defenses are always up to date.

Employee Engagement and Policy Development:

  • Contrary to popular belief, monitoring tools can actually enhance employee engagement. By involving employees in the development of web-use policies and educating them about the benefits of monitoring, employers can foster a culture of mutual respect and understanding.
  • Tools like Cyfin provide the data necessary to develop fair and effective policies, creating a more secure and productive work environment.

In conclusion, the implementation of a sophisticated employee web-use monitoring tool like Cyfin is not just a means to an end. It’s a strategic decision that can yield a multitude of benefits. From enhancing investigative capabilities and ensuring compliance to identifying actual human behavior and optimizing productivity, the right tool can transform how a company navigates the complexities of the digital age.

Reporting Issue

Category: Reporting

Issue

Report returns with zero visits

Resolution

  • Repair and download the latest list
    • Screen Path (‘Categorization – URL list – Repair’ and click the ‘Submit’ button)
  • Delete imported data with issue
    • Screen Path (‘Data Management – Report Database – Delete – Manual’) 
  • Re-import data with issue
    • Screen Path (‘Data Management – Report Database – Import – Manual’)

If this didn’t resolve the issue please call or email support

  • 321-953-5351 ext. 4
  • support@wavecrest.net

SSL Inspection with Firewalls: Challenges and Effective Solutions

Category: Best Practices, SSL Inspection

Strain on Firewall Performance

In our ever-evolving digital landscape, the focus on cybersecurity and data integrity has never been higher. SSL inspection, which is the process of decrypting and inspecting HTTPS traffic to monitor and regulate web content, is one way organizations aim to boost their cybersecurity posture. Many businesses trust their firewalls to undertake this task, but as technology advances, this approach presents several challenges:

1. Strain on Firewall Performance

The computational load required to perform SSL inspection can be demanding, and this additional burden may affect a firewall’s core functions. If a firewall is overtaxed with decrypting and inspecting traffic, its primary responsibility—shielding your network from threats—may suffer.

2. Limited SSL Inspection Capabilities

Not all firewalls are created equal. While some might possess robust SSL inspection capabilities, others might offer limited functionality or none at all. If you’re relying on a firewall without the necessary capabilities, your organization’s web traffic remains largely unseen.

3. Emerging Encryption Technologies

With encrypted DNS (DoH) and Encrypted Client Hello becoming increasingly popular, firewalls will find it increasingly challenging to intercept and examine traffic. These encryption advancements can limit the efficacy of even the most sophisticated firewalls, rendering them less effective for SSL inspection.

Given these challenges, many experts suggest looking beyond firewalls for SSL inspection.

Proxy-Based Solutions: The Way Forward

For environments seeking comprehensive SSL inspection without overloading their firewall, proxy-based solutions are often the ideal answer. These solutions are specifically crafted to execute SSL inspection tasks, offering detailed monitoring and reporting on employee web activity.

One of the trusted names in this arena is Wavecrest Computing. With nearly three decades in the field, Wavecrest has designed tools like Cyfin and CyBlock to address the specific challenges of SSL inspection.

CyBlock stands out as a premium choice for those in need. Not only does it offer the extensive monitoring and reporting features found in Cyfin, but it can also filter web access in real-time if desired. For businesses solely seeking SSL inspection, monitoring, and reporting, CyBlock fits the bill perfectly.

In Conclusion

Relying solely on a firewall for SSL inspection can lead to potential vulnerabilities and performance issues. As encrypted web traffic becomes the norm and emerging encryption technologies come into play, the challenges will only increase. Solutions like Cyfin and CyBlock from Wavecrest Computing can help businesses rise to these challenges, ensuring robust cybersecurity while providing detailed insights into web activity. If your current setup falls short or you’re aiming to optimize SSL inspection without taxing your firewall, Wavecrest offers the specialized solutions you need.

v9.6.2 Release Notes for Cyfin

Category: Release Notes

Enhancements

  • System
    •  Added ability to import Groups and IDs through Directory Agent.
  • System Status
    • Messages
      • Visualizer
        • Added screen to view Visualizer profiling information.
  • Reporting
    • Dashboard
      • Visualizer
        • Added preconfigured dashboard templates for users to select when creating new dashboards.
        • Updated timeframe selection to always be relative when creating/editing dashboards. Modifying the timeframe in the dashboard view page is only temporary and a button is added to reset back to default timeframe selection. Navigating away also resets the timeframe back to dashboard default.

Corrections

  • Reporting
    • Dashboard
      • Visualizer
        • Corrected visualizer link in product menu when user account does not have a valid email address by redirecting to logon accounts modification screen.

v9.2.8.p Release Notes for CyBlock Software

Category: Administration

Enhancement

  • Reporting
    • Updated email client to allow for single report email to multiple recipients instead of each recipients getting their own copy of the report.
  • Logon Accounts
    • Updated email client to explicitly identify new account email notifications as text/plain.
  • Proxy
    • Updated file extension blocking to check content-disposition header record for actual filename instead of just URL path to increase effectiveness of filename extension blocking.
  • JAVA Environment
    • JRE upgraded to newer version.

Correction

  • Proxy
    • Corrected issue when notating large downloads (greater than 2 gigs) that caused these downloads to fail.
  • Popups
    • Corrected text overflow issue in popups which caused the overflow text to be hidden.